More 60s Nostalgia Planned for Fall Network Lineup

6 Jul
I stopped reading the New York Times online when they implemented their subscription policy (another story for another day), so it’s no wonder that I missed this article, which claims that the networks are striving for “fresh” this coming fall.  What really caught my attention when I was reading was just a brief mention of “Pan Am,” a show planned for ABC’s fall lineup about, what else?–Pan Am airlines.

From the accompanying graphic featuring stewardesses in white gloves and pillbox hats, it should be obvious that the creators of “Pan Am” have observed the success of AMC’s “Mad Men” and are seeking to capitalize on the 60s nostalgia that made the show about the golden age of advertising a hit.

I’m not much of a television person, and I don’t watch “Mad Men” (though I have been informed that I ought to make a point of doing so – we’ll put it on my to do list).  However, I am vaguely aware of the fact that the show deals intimately with high-power “boys’ clubs,” smoking, highball glasses, fantastic costuming and hairstyles, and pretty people.  Sounds like a good time to me, and to the like, thirty or forty people who watch it.

Even though I don’t watch “Mad Men,” I can imagine that it makes for interesting television.  The early 1960s were a pretty fascinating time in American history, if one is interested in social trends.  After ten years of “I like Ike” and the nation’s “return to normalcy” following World War II, the early 60s existed in a state of tension and identity crisis.  It was sandwiched right between the idyllic 50s (or seemingly idyllic) and the protest culture of the late 60s and early 70s.  With social upheaval hovering threateningly on the horizon, anything set in the early 60s is going to be dripping with dramatic irony.  The audience knows, though the characters don’t, that their worlds are going to change, even as the privileged classes cling so desperately to their rigid gender roles and their cigarettes.  If only they could have seen what was coming…

It’s because of this dynamic that I think a show like “Pan Am” has some serious potential.  Not only that, but the American sentiment for commercial airlines has been steadily decreasing for years, and I’d argue even more dramatically in the past ten.  Increased security measures, new charges for checked (and carry-on) luggage, the Kevin Smith vs. Southwest debacle, the “enhanced patdown” – I’d imagine that any show about an airline would capture our attention, especially one that would obviously be steeped in nostalgia about when flying was an event, not an agonizing, and sometimes traumatic, chore.

The promotional image featuring the snappily-dressed stewardesses indicates to me, at least, that this show is going to deal with gender.  Now, I’m all about smart television that deals with issues (and in fact, the aforementioned article also highlights another 60s nostalgia show about the Playboy empire in Chicago, which no doubt, will also deal intimately with gender and boys’ clubs), but I have to wonder if these nostalgia shows don’t allow us to make excuses?  What I mean is, I wonder if by highlighting sexism or racism in a television series that takes place 50 years ago, we feel justified in patting ourselves on the backs and saying, “Wow, they were all so sexist/racist/whatever back then!  Isn’t it great that we’re not like that now?”  In the Stuff White People Like entry on “Mad Men,” Christian Lander humorously gives the following advice to any Person of Color hosting a “Mad Men” party:

The party should essentially run itself, however, you can severely curtail the amount of fun by saying: “I’m glad this isn’t really 1960 or else I’d be serving all of you.”

White people often find truth to be very depressing at theme parties.

If, indeed, “Pan Am” intends to delve into the social issues surrounding 1960s air travel (as it seems only logical that it will do), I wonder if it will spawn a “Pan Am” theme party trend, and I wonder if any women will show up dressed as pilots?  Because it was so silly back then, that only sexy young women could be flight attendants, and that whole pilot boys’ club was ridiculous!  Aren’t you glad it’s not like that anymore?

I’m sure you know where I’m going with this (definitely NSFW).

The boys’ club is alive and well in the airline industry.  Only 6% of commercial airline pilots are women [H/T].  Do you suppose that by the time “Pan Am” premieres this fall, we will have all forgotten about this?  Will it affect the way we view the show, knowing that there is no possible way anyone could grin and say, “Thank goodness it’s not like that anymore?”  Because clearly, it’s still like that.  It’s still very much like that.

[Image Source]

5 Responses to “More 60s Nostalgia Planned for Fall Network Lineup”

  1. Eldritch Panda July 6, 2011 at 3:17 pm #

    This is such an interesting topic, and one I’ve been thinking about lately. You’ve probably seen my tweets about “That ’70s Show” and how just when I start to like it, it fails epic-ly. When talking about it on FB, my cousin connected the fail-stuff to the time period saying that people were “less accepting” of people who are gay, fat, trans, and had more staunched gender roles so that’s why the show has the same feel. I think that reasoning is bullshit, as the show presents these ideas in a very winkwinknudgenudge sort of way which indicates that the audience is free to laugh at the “un-PC” concepts they would be tsked at for in present day. That kind of thing gives me the creeps.

    I do watch “Mad Men,” and I enjoy it. The lives and scenes it depicts to me is very different though. It is an intense and frustrating show that doesn’t dodge away from how fucked up the ’60s was for people. While the show is as male dominated as the rest of television programming, I find that the female parts are very rich in complexity. They are background characters and yet have some of the most intriguing and powerful storylines. I appreciate that about the show. Yet, I do see what you mean concerning these types of shows giving us a feeling of “whew, I’m glad it’s not like that anymore!” Though I’m not entirely sure I think “Mad Men” does that. Most of the time it makes it more frustrated with the current state of affairs because I see so much correlation between those times and now.

    Of course, I’m kind of versed in SJ so maybe I’m not the best person to analysis this type of thing. I hope that ABC’s new show will take on an essence more like “Mad Men” than “That ’70s Show.” ABC can be a quality station sometimes, though I’ve hardly forgiven them for canceling “Huge,” so they better get their shit together.

    • Megan King July 6, 2011 at 4:38 pm #

      Like I said, I’ve never seen “Mad Men,” but I doubt that its intention is explicitly to make people feel proud that things are better now. That’s our mistake. And it’s true that things are better now – of course they are. But they’re not all better.

      Of course, when you’re talking about something like “That 70s Show,” it’s one thing to be aware of the social conventions of the time, and another thing altogether to make a fat joke and put a laugh track behind it, you know? That’s not being conscious of the time period – that’s a fat joke. :)

      Also, I too have never truly stopped mourning the loss of “Huge.” Le SIGH. That one hurt.

      • Eldritch Panda July 6, 2011 at 4:59 pm #

        Oh, I wasn’t trying to say I felt you were saying that was “Mad Men’s” intent, I was just talking a little about my own personal reactions to it since you haven’t seen it. Sorry, my writing is clunky sometimes. I just thought it was an interesting idea that people would view “Mad Men” (and other “past” shows) and see it as something that exemplifies how we live in a “post-sexism” (or other -ism) society, since I didn’t see it that way and I realized that you are making some good points that I want to ruminate about some. :) And I wanted to share with you about a show that I thought did the genre justice (Mad Men) vs. one I thought did so poorly.

        Exactly re: “That ’70s Show!” I knew you’d understand me.

        • Megan King July 6, 2011 at 5:36 pm #

          We’re all good, friend :) Thanks for the feedback!


  1. Links: Rat Vagina Edition | Brass Tacks - August 17, 2011

    […]  You might remember a while ago that I myself wrote something similar when I spotted plans for the fall premiere of Pan-Am.  Is it shitty to quote myself?  Fuck it, […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: